10 Feb
2025
10 Feb
'25
9:43 p.m.
On Fri Feb 7 10:08:21 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
I think the lazy initialization makes the code very non-obvious where the state is being kept, and reading the code it's as if wineserver could begin using the objects then only later delegating things to the kernel, which, according to your description elsewhere is not going to work.
That's a valid concern, but I'm more than a little hesitant to *not* lazily initialize just because of that. I'd rather just add a comment explaining why we lazily create and that the state is identical to what it is at creation time.