On Mon Sep 29 12:25:25 2025 +0000, Matteo Bruni wrote:
I would be inclined to just leave it alone until we find something
that cares. I'd rather keep the code as simple as possible in cases like this. Done. The tests had to be adjusted a bit; they're not particularly nice now but it's either that, effectively duplicating a bunch of test functions or reducing the tested surface.
Sorry for the delay, bad time management here.
Done. The tests had to be adjusted a bit; they're not particularly nice now but it's either that, effectively duplicating a bunch of test functions or reducing the tested surface.
Ergh. I don't mind a bit of ugliness; the problem is that we're not going to notice when the tests get fixed. Better would be to either duplicate the offending tests, or add some todo fields...