On Tue Jul 4 16:17:38 2023 +0000, Fabian Maurer wrote:
Yeah, that makes sense. Especially since this is the first time weak reference is implemented, I want to make it as perfect as possible, so it can be used as a reference for other objects. Anything else I should adjust, or do we consider this finished now?
Would you mind changing it to `ReadNoFence`? I think it's better as it is a relaxed atomic operation, and we only need the acquire semantic on the interlocked exchange.
I think it's the last nitpick I have.