21 Oct
2023
21 Oct
'23
7:34 a.m.
On Sat Oct 21 06:33:25 2023 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
Yeah, it makes sense. Actually, it already happens every now and then with the macOS tests, so it wouldn't be bad to have something similar there too.
Is this solution acceptable? It trusts that `WaitForSingleObject()` after `TerminateProcess()` returns in short time, in the spirit of `wait()` on Unix. Or should I just close the handle without waiting for the process if I terminate it?