Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] MR2242: win32u: Do not set last error in wait_message() for zero count.

[Jacek Caban (＠jacek)]

On Tue Feb 21 16:50:47 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
> That's probably better, yeah.
> I'm still not a fan, because it makes the API meaning when count is 0
> completely different from the API meaning when count is nonzero. If it
> were up to me, I'd rather make something closer to process_events() into
> the user driver API, and that'd allow us to factor out more common code
> into win32u as well. But I don't really want to argue about it.

I like that idea. `MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx` gives drivers a bit more flexibility, but they don't use it anyway. It could be as simple as `BOOL (*pProcessEvents)(DWORD mask);`.