On Tue Nov 21 00:11:49 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Why introduce the separate "integer" rule?
I suppose part of the reason is to handle vector and matrix, but it turns out those are supposed to be able to take arbitrary expressions anyway, constant folding and all.
Yep, that was indeed the function. But since it is as you say, I removed the rule and just used C_INTEGER, I can imagine the case of using "u" on these sizes infrequent enough.