Re: [PATCH 0/5] MR1622: d3d10/effect: Add support for more instructions.

[Matteo Bruni (＠Mystral)]

On Thu Dec  1 20:31:48 2022 +0000, Matteo Bruni wrote:
> Would it make sense to broaden this check to property_info->size != table->count?
> Also we could probably print the sizes (especially table->count) in the message.

For the records, I was thinking something like:

```suggestion:-4+0
                if (property_info->size != table->count)
                {
                    WARN("Unexpected value expression output size %u, property size %u.\n",
                            table->count, property_info->size);
                    return;
                }
```