Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] MR2905: sapi: implement more token functionality.

[Shaun Ren (＠shaunren)]

On Tue May 30 14:12:22 2023 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
> > Since the current implementation uses the key in token_enum I would
>
> have to re-stub the current implementation in order to split the second
> commit. Would this be a good idea?
> No, that would cause a regression.
> Couldn't you add the changes to `TokenEnumBuilder` without changing
> `token_category_EnumTokens()` in the first instance?

Unfortunately not, since the new tokens array replaces the HKEY stored originally in `token_enum`. The old implementation of `EnumTokens` uses this HKEY: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/2905/diffs?commit_id=43... .