On Mon Mar 24 23:15:36 2025 +0000, William Horvath wrote:
Are you sure you looked at the patch fully? I don't see how I'm doing anything opposed to what you're saying.
One could argue the ENOSYS check should be right beside the dlsym call, not beside the regular invocation. That change would remove a branch from the loop, and make it a little more clear what the code is doing; but it will add a syscall to the setup step, and make it more code in total.
I have no opinion on which is better.