28 Oct
2022
28 Oct
'22
7:29 p.m.
On Fri Oct 28 19:24:08 2022 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
I thought I had replied again to this thread, but it seems by reply got lost somehow. Annoying. Anyway, if @fcasas is willing to keep steering this, I would suggest him to rework his proposal according to the criteria that were discussed. Even before, since also some type definition refactoring was suggested, maybe that could be an even earlier step (like refactoring `struct hlsl_type`, precomputing the name, renaming `type` and `base_type` together with their enums, something else?).
Maybe, but I'm also not sure it needs to block this patch. In line with what Henri said, there's no harm in having some of this documentation be partial or temporary.