On Thu Feb 1 14:34:23 2024 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
changed this line in [version 5 of the diff](/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/607/diffs?diff_id=97258&start_sha=c83e101abbd96afc9f16c30b370be66ba0edd158#4fae87cf1e8d06a5c7871f244e3dd75ef2dac299_2903_2903)
Right. I also noticed that RET is actually not different from any other instruction, so I merged it there. I left it as an explicit case instead of lumping it into the default case to make it explicit that it has to be treated like any other instruction.