28 Mar
2023
28 Mar
'23
3:10 p.m.
On Wed Jan 25 12:19:10 2023 +0000, Piotr Caban wrote:
I don't think it's a good idea to stub functions related to synchronization. Do you know what will it take to implement it properly? Maybe it would be enough to introduce a simple wrapper around RtlWaitOnAddress that will store information if the context is blocked.
@piotr Do you know what "synchronously blocked" might mean? I would need to find that out, but the implementation itself shouldn't be too hard, as you said it could just be a `LONG synchronously_blocked;` that is changed using `InterlockedOr`/`InterlockedAnd`.