On Wed May 29 23:53:29 2024 +0000, Connor McAdams wrote:
Yeah in hindsight I think I might have been trying to make things more generic than was necessary. I've spent some time mapping it out and I think it can be done without callbacks. It might lead to some loop duplication, but I don't think that's the worst thing, and it will probably make the code clearer. I've changed things around in the current revision, let me know what you think. :)
I'm guilty of over-complicating things myself. Also, often the easier route becomes clear only after the fact :slight_smile:
I guess the most interesting bits are still down the road, but it does look nicer for now. And yes, I feel like it's going to be a net positive if it's just a matter of duplicating a few simple loops. Feel free to push back if it starts to turn into a mess, though.