On Mon Nov 20 10:35:29 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Can you please add a test for this? I *think* it should be possible to extend the existing server.idl with another function. It turns out that, somewhat surprisingly, FC_BIND_PRIMITIVE really is different from FC_BIND_GENERIC and FC_BIND_CONTEXT. The latter two are written into the proc format string (and so are handled during unmarshalling), whereas FC_BIND_PRIMITIVE isn't. It may be worth adding a comment to that effect. There's a whitespace error in one of the added lines (space before semicolon).
Hi, There is a space that need to be removed. I wrote a test that may be a little lacking. Take a look at it.[1.diff](/uploads/e9ee2eb7558eaabe6b3c984d38dc18dc/1.diff)