On Thu Sep 4 20:04:37 2025 +0000, Tim Clem wrote:
Ah thanks, that makes sense. There's a new version up that takes the approach of giving each font set its own array that's a copy of the collection's (and caching a copy on the collection the first time a font set is made). That seemed far simpler to me than another level of indirection with its own refcount, though the lack of copying with that approach is appealing. Let me know what you think and if you'd prefer the other direction.
I think there is a better way. I'm going to rework existing parts a bit, so that it fits better.