On Fri Jun 30 07:13:04 2023 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
The EDataFlow* argument is not set here, but the caller relies on it.
Whoops, sorry I missed that! Looks good to me as of a2340fa2438f14e1ce3a893f600b8eae0703f459
I wonder why tests didn't fail... maybe out of pure (un)luck the value at that memory location was valid.