Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] MR680: vkd3d-shader: Nearly get rid of vkd3d_shader_desc.

[Francisco Casas (＠fcasas)]

On Thu Mar  7 19:21:01 2024 +0000, Giovanni Mascellani wrote:
> I would call that "transferring ownership" rather than "lending", and I
> don't think it's a problem in itself. You're right that I wasn't doing
> that properly, though, so hopefully now it is fixed. Now ownership of
> `dxbc_desc` remains with `vkd3d_shader_sm6_parser_create()`, which
> merely lends a reference to it to `sm6_parser_init()`, which in turn
> will decide whether to move ownership of the signatures to the program
> or not (but in both cases exactly one entity remains the owner of the
> signatures). Is that better for you?

Sorry, I said "lend" incorrectly. Yes, "transferring ownership" is appropriate.

Okay, it is better.