On Wed Aug 23 03:52:42 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
It's from 2dc3d2454, for bug 45932. So it's basically a regression test, and as such does have some real value. But if it's going to take a ridiculous amount of time then I think it's just not worth that cost. Ideally we'd just get rid of it on llvmpipe where it takes too long to render. We don't have a good way to detect llvmpipe, but we could add one. But if tweaking the numbers is enough for now then we can live with that instead. I just don't think the todo_wine makes sense.
Hmm, I see your point. I wanted to have some sort of notice in the test output that things took longer than expected. Would a trace work for you? But we wouldn't see that on test.winehq.org by default I think.
What I want is some sort of message that says "hey, this took really long. If the test times out down the line, this might be why"