On Thu Mar 28 19:26:29 2024 +0000, Francisco Casas wrote:
Well, just more `count` and `capacity` fields and the implicit assumption that the order of the state block entries doesn't matter. I think Nikolay is also in favor of keeping them in the same struct; given his reply to my status e-mail.
I still don't like overloading fields like that, but I don't really want to argue about this either.