28 Feb
2024
28 Feb
'24
1:24 p.m.
On Wed Feb 28 08:37:46 2024 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
Do we need this to be Wayland specific? At least something like that seems more appropriate:
[EGL ${notice_platform}development files not found, the Wayland driver won't support OpenGL])
What you propose is fine for the early commits. However, we eventually end up testing for more than EGL (`test -z "$SONAME_LIBEGL" -o -z "$SONAME_LIBOPENGL" -o -z "$HAVE_LIBWAYLAND_EGL"`) so a more specific message seems more descriptive. Would you be prefer I evolve the message along with the requirements? Or do you think the generic message is good enough anyway?
If we use `EGL_KHR_client_get_all_proc_addresses` (i.e, depend directly only on EGL and wayland-egl, not OpenGL) the EGL only notice is probably good enough.