Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] MR9522: dmsynth: DLS fixes, part 2

[Anton Baskanov (＠baskanov)]

On Wed Nov 19 08:40:39 2025 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
> Can we split these conditions or align them differently so the operator
> precedence gets readable?
>     if (conn->usTransform != CONN_TRN_NONE)
>     {
>         if (conn->usTransform != CONN_TRANSFORM(CONN_TRN_BIPOLAR,
> CONN_TRN_NONE, CONN_TRN_NONE)) return FALSE;
>         if (conn->usSource != CONN_SRC_LFO && conn->usSource !=
> CONN_SRC_VIBRATO) return FALSE;
>     }
>
> For instance.

Yes, of course. Done.