Re: [PATCH 0/8] MR7848: server: Use events as a sync for several objects.

[Rémi Bernon (＠rbernon)]

On Fri Apr 18 08:19:13 2025 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
> What is meant by inproc syncs here, is it ntsync from MR 7226 or
> something else?

Yes it is, some objects are still supposed to be signaled from wineserver side, and I think it would be cleaner if they use event objects for it.

Otherwise they each need their own inproc sync fd in addition to their own server signal/wait logic, and it spreads ntsync-specific calls everywhere when inproc sync/server sync logic is usually exclusive.

Using event objects instead reduces the changes needed to introduce ntsync inproc syncs to only a couple of objects (events/mutex/semaphore/queue and a two other object types which have very specific server only sync logic).