On Mon Apr 21 17:49:07 2025 +0000, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
Understandable, and yes even if it's just to simplify !246 first, it's also a step in the right direction in terms of correctness (which IMO is the most important), and while no app "directly" requires this to not "break", it is indeed used by e.g. file managers (it was my original issue with !246 too, and still is, though I carry my own patches for it), and I've seen people interested in it so I'm not the only one that uses file managers in Wine... So personally I'd rather have it fixed as-is, but if it would help to reduce its scope to get it in (as long as !246 can get in, since I need that one) I wouldn't be too hesitant to change. That said, I'd want to know for sure before I proceed since IMO we put quite some work into it so far to have it correct. @julliard any thoughts please? Or would someone else review it?
It looks like a lot of complexity for something that it's very unlikely that an app would require...