On Thu Jan 30 11:10:53 2025 +0000, Jinoh Kang wrote:
I'm inclined to think that non-ntsync code will be eventually phased out to minimize bitrotting code, instead introducing a "dumb" ntsync backend (for older kernels and other OSes) in tandem with the "Linux" ntsync backend (from this MR). In that perspective, `ntsync_` seems more fit if such code structuring is ever to take place.
I doubt non-ntsync support will be dropped, while wine is mainly used on Linux, it also has some uses on non Linux/ntsync systems.