On Thu Jun 19 01:56:35 2025 +0000, Yuxuan Shui wrote:
i don't understand those array-bounds warnings from gcc, they seem nonsensical to me.
oh, it's complaining when the list is empty `pLastRR` only points to a `PDNS_RECORD` (`= &rr1->pFirstRR`), which is not as big as a `DNS_RECORDW`? why doesn't it complain before, and how does this MR make it suddenly realize this?