On Tue Oct 18 15:00:22 2022 +0000, Jinoh Kang wrote:
changed this line in [version 5 of the diff](/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/363/diffs?diff_id=14321&start_sha=b26befee74cca6dd2f33627808e5c3e72c3abc02#f8a9b0a0de0f400890a130a2270e9b8ec63f701d_9300_9298)
Is it so bad? Maybe we could cover multiple skips with a single win_skip() or something like that. We could also maybe limit number of tested cases, some cases are surely less interesting than others.
Also, all those printf()s would ideally use trace() instead.