Apologies for it spamming the log. My intention was, as my comment describes, to be louder about cases where we're running out of memory. Often such allocation failures are indeed fatal, since many applications (and internal Wine code) does not expect them. I didn't intend for there to be, nor did I write, any requirements around the bits of address space. It raises the question for me of why we're trying to allocate memory that high if we know it's above the address limit.