Re: [PATCH 0/4] MR3329: winsock: Better cancel asyncs when socket handle is closed.

[Zebediah Figura (＠zfigura)]

On Fri Jul 14 18:44:09 2023 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
> I think test with CloseHandle() before terminating thread covers this
> case? With only condition (1) in place the tests with 'other process
> handle' enabled will fail. Test without "other process" still closes the
> original handle, although duplicates that into the same process thus
> showing that handles per process make a difference.

But you're still terminating the thread. Do we have a test where we create an async, duplicate the object handle into another process, then close every handle in the originating process, but without the originating thread exiting or being terminated?