On Tue Dec 6 16:17:19 2022 +0000, Alex Henrie wrote:
This one was actually intentional: I thought that since the function is only used in this file, and is now a wrapper around free instead of msi_free, that it shouldn't have the msi_ prefix. (The same goes for msi_alloc_package, although I meant to change that one to alloc_package, not malloc_package.) But I will put the prefix back if you prefer.
I think they are better without the prefix, but note that there are many static functions with the prefix in this dll. It's not very consistent.