30 Mar
2023
30 Mar
'23
9:04 a.m.
On Thu Mar 30 08:47:54 2023 +0000, **** wrote:
Marvin replied on the mailing list:
Hi, It looks like your patch introduced the new failures shown below. Please investigate and fix them before resubmitting your patch. If they are not new, fixing them anyway would help a lot. Otherwise please ask for the known failures list to be updated. The tests also ran into some preexisting test failures. If you know how to fix them that would be helpful. See the TestBot job for the details: The full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=131296 Your paranoid android. === w11pro64 (32 bit report) === imm32: imm32.c:4320: Test failed: ImmLoadIME returned 0, error 126 imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, IME_SELECT select 1 imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 1 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002009D, IME_SELECT select 1 imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 2 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x285, wparam 0x1, lparam 0xe020047f imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 3 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x282, wparam 0x2, lparam 0 imm32.c:4349: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 00020125, IME_SELECT select 1 imm32.c:4356: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 00020125, IME_SELECT select 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, IME_NOTIFY action 0x15, index 0x4, value 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 1 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002009D, IME_NOTIFY action 0x15, index 0x4, value 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 2 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x282, wparam 0x1, lparam 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 3 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x285, wparam 0, lparam 0xe020047f imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 4 (missing): hkl 04090409, himc 0002020B, IME_SELECT select 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 5 (missing): hkl 04090409, himc 0002009D, IME_SELECT select 0 imm32.c:3927: Test failed: ImmLoadIME returned 0, error 126 imm32.c:3937: Test failed: got ret 0, error 0 imm32.c:3938: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, IME_PROCESS_KEY vkey 0x41, key_data 0 imm32.c:4424: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x10d, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4426: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x10e, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4428: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x10f, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4430: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x281, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4432: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl E020047F, himc 0002020B, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x282, wparam 0, lparam 0 === w1064_adm (64 bit report) === imm32: 1ca4:imm32: unhandled exception c0000005 at 00007FF806DFBB75 === w11pro64_amd (64 bit report) === imm32: imm32.c:4320: Test failed: ImmLoadIME returned 0, error 126 imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, IME_SELECT select 1 imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 1 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000000C027D, IME_SELECT select 1 imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 2 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x285, wparam 0x1, lparam 0xffffffffe020047f imm32.c:4327: Test failed: 3 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x282, wparam 0x2, lparam 0 imm32.c:4349: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000000C009F, IME_SELECT select 1 imm32.c:4356: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000000C009F, IME_SELECT select 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, IME_NOTIFY action 0x15, index 0x4, value 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 1 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000000C027D, IME_NOTIFY action 0x15, index 0x4, value 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 2 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x282, wparam 0x1, lparam 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 3 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x285, wparam 0, lparam 0xffffffffe020047f imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 4 (missing): hkl 0000000004090409, himc 00000000001602F3, IME_SELECT select 0 imm32.c:4364: Test failed: 5 (missing): hkl 0000000004090409, himc 00000000000C027D, IME_SELECT select 0 imm32.c:3927: Test failed: ImmLoadIME returned 0, error 126 imm32.c:3937: Test failed: got ret 0, error 0 imm32.c:3938: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, IME_PROCESS_KEY vkey 0x41, key_data 0 imm32.c:4424: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x10d, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4426: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x10e, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4428: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x10f, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4430: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x281, wparam 0, lparam 0 imm32.c:4432: Test failed: 0 (missing): hkl FFFFFFFFE020047F, himc 00000000001602F3, MSG_IME_UI msg 0x282, wparam 0, lparam 0
The w11 failures seems to be new spurious failures but probably unrelated. The Windows IME caching mechanism starts to be a little bit annoying, I'm not yet sure what to do about it.