Re: [PATCH 0/3] MR8507: widl: Drop an incorrect check on runtimeclass definitions.

[Rémi Bernon (＠rbernon)]

On Fri Jul  4 13:29:55 2025 +0000, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> midl? Isn't runtimeclass a winrt-only type? midlrt definitely accepts this:
> namespace Winetest {
>     [
>         contract(Windows.Foundation.UniversalApiContract, 1.0),
>         uuid(11111111-2222-3333-4444-555555555555),
>     ]
>     interface IWineInterface : IInspectable
>     {
>         HRESULT WineMethod( int param );
>     };
>     [
>         contract(Windows.Foundation.UniversalApiContract, 1.0),
>     ]
>     runtimeclass WineRuntimeClass
>     {
>         interface IWineInterface;
>     };
> }

The error might be relaxed to having at least one interface rather than a default one, but if you remove the interface you get an error.
> midl? Isn't runtimeclass a winrt-only type?

Sure, midl, midlrt, it's more or less the same thing as one might call the other or the other way around anyway.