On Tue Feb 27 07:50:52 2024 +0000, Conor McCarthy wrote:
changed this line in [version 4 of the diff](/wine/vkd3d/-/merge_requests/675/diffs?diff_id=101799&start_sha=3715dc59f543287fba9541e65d0c0b957f92af53#282778267e3fda4be8fe588f5d16e9ec352745de_3756_3748)
I suppose in line of principle that could be even more general. I.e., something like `data_type_is_64_bit(src->reg.data_type) && !data_type_is_64_bit(dst->reg.data_type)`. However I'm not sure the general case can happen so far, so that can be deferred to when we'll have a practical case.