Re: [PATCH 0/2] MR1166: ntdll: don't claim to have not found a library that is in place

[Alexandre Julliard (＠julliard)]

> So I presume, I need to modify my patch a little, to only print the
> error when `if (current_modref)` holds *(i.e. to remove the `else`
> branch)*. The `current_modref` being set implies we're trying to load
> the lib because it's required by something else.

That won't help, it's legitimate to try to load a dll to see if it can
be loaded, just like opening a non-existent file. It's also expected
for it to fail if some dependency is missing, that's not necessarily a
problem.  Printing an error at that point is going to cause a lot of
false positives.