19 Jan
2024
19 Jan
'24
10:20 p.m.
On Fri Jan 19 04:03:15 2024 +0000, Zhiyi Zhang wrote:
You can remove this line.
Together with the +1 above, this was meant to verify that array entries past number returned by the call that actually fills them are untouched (and +1 was for the case where the implementation returns exactly as many adapters as the length of the array that was passed). If you believe it's not something worth testing, I'll just remove this and +1 above.