Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] MR1268: wininet: Partially implement InternetSetFilePointer

[Jason Kuo (＠j20001970)]

On Tue Nov  8 17:37:06 2022 +0000, Jacek Caban wrote:
> The reason for those failures is that we expect tests to work after each
> commit. You could, for example, add todo_wines in the first patch and
> then remove them in the second one.
> Also, it would be interesting to have tests checking the actual
> functionality. For example, read some data after moving the file pointer
> and make sure it contains expected value.

Understood, will do more tests to check if the function actually works before updating the patch.