14 Feb
2025
14 Feb
'25
11:45 a.m.
On Fri Feb 7 10:39:31 2025 +0000, Alexandros Frantzis wrote:
Thanks @rbernon. The more I consider `{wlr,ext}-data-control` the more enticing it looks for our use case. So an implementation based primarily on it, plus a *simple* fallback to `wl_data_device` seems like a good way forward.
Here is the alternative proposal based on the data-control protocols: https://gitlab.winehq.org/wine/wine/-/merge_requests/7336