On Fri Sep 19 13:45:19 2025 +0000, Connor McAdams wrote:
I _think_ I used that name because it matches with `dst_component` which already existed when I added this. Is the confusion that it comes from the source format? I guess it could make more sense as just `cur_ctype` or `ctype`.
Yeah, exactly. `ctype` works for me :slight_smile: