On Mon Aug 28 12:10:34 2023 +0000, Gabriel Ivăncescu wrote:
I didn't look into that yet because I didn't want to rely on a solution that needs wine-gecko changes, since it can take a while and I wanted to get these in for now (even if they could be changed/improved later when wine-gecko is updated). I'll see if I can do something about it now, but from the snippet you posted, it looks like we can assume the ccref never immediately destroys the object when it reaches 0?
See Gecko sources for how it handles extra shouldDelete parameter.