Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] MR6441: quartz: Register the classes from their native DLLs.

[Rémi Bernon (＠rbernon)]

On Thu Sep  5 17:13:10 2024 +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Is the filters<>quartz call order intentional?
> I suspect ideally the filters will go first. Plus one will continue to
> unregister the whole thing even if one of those fail.
> In other projects, these matter not sure about here though. Take it fwiw.

The reordering wasn't intentional thanks, I restored the original order. It was returning early on failure so I had kept that. I don't think it is supposed to fail anyway.