Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] MR8466: ntdll: Also restore rbp before calling user mode callback.

[Yuxuan Shui (＠yshui)]

On Mon Jul  7 16:22:14 2025 +0000, Paul Gofman wrote:
> Yeah thanks I will look in details a bit later, there are some things to
> edit (like "asm", probably a bit of portability issues, separate #ifdefs
> for which we have common places) which I am going to look through in
> details. Quick question: why not checking rbp value explicitly along
> with the other registers and instead making that checked indirectly
> through using rbp based frame? IMO instead not using rbp frame and
> checking explicitly would make more sense.

you mean "%rbp = 0xdeadbeef" then check for that?