On Wed Oct 22 14:18:33 2025 +0000, Jacek Caban wrote:
It is correct and we have tests for that. I think you're confusing it with EGL/GLX, which indeed returns context-independent pointers, so they don't need an active context. WGL is different than that. Returned pointers are documented to be context-dependent and may even be valid between contexts.
Alright, my bad.