j
k
j a
j l
Piotr Caban (@piotr) commented about dlls/msvcp90/details.c:
queue->tail = p; if(!queue->head) queue->head = p; queue->lock = 0; WriteRelease(&queue->lock, 0);
queue->tail = p; if(!queue->head) queue->head = p;
queue->lock = 0;
WriteRelease(&queue->lock, 0);
Isn't it better to make the `lock` member volatile?
Back to the thread
Back to the list