On 7/27/22 02:11, Alexandre Julliard (@julliard) wrote:
We could probably get rid of -fno-PIC at this point, this is solved in a better way by doing a Mingw build.
Returning to this... I don't really understand this assertion. MinGW gcc forces PIC, and it also solves other unrelated problems, but I don't see how it does PIC in a better way?
It's not clear to me to what extent we want to keep non-MinGW builds functional at this point, but if we do at all, why introduce a regression? Especially when a *lot* of applications are known to depend on non-PIC code.