On Thu Jun 26 09:41:16 2025 +0000, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Is it correct to swap those and ignore "!linear_buffer && locks" condition that was a failing path before?
I just tested the behavior on Windows, and what we currently have is correct. Apologies, I got tunnel vision on the optimisation and didn't test the Windows behavior before raising the MR. I'll close this, as I don't think it belongs upstream.