On Thu Oct 5 21:42:07 2023 +0000, Aidan Khoury wrote:
Seems okay according to [Adobe's terms](https://www.adobe.com/ca/legal/terms.html#content): `3.6 Content Files. “Content Files” means Adobe assets provided as part of the Services and Software. Unless documentation or specific licenses (including but not limited to Additional Terms) state otherwise, we grant you a personal, non-exclusive, non-sublicensable (except if you are a Business, then sublicensable only to your Business Users), and non-transferable license to use the Content Files to create your end use (i.e., the derivative application or product authored by you) into which the Content Files, or derivations thereof, are embedded for your use (“End Use”). You may modify the Content Files prior to embedding them in the End Use. You may reproduce and distribute Content Files only in connection with your End Use, however, under no circumstances can you distribute the Content Files on a stand-alone basis, outside of the End Use.` However, I am no expert, but I see no issue in using these for test cases according to Adobe's terms.
I used binary resources instead of header files full of an array of bytes: de05aea3c1a1213de90bbf433e8258753b1b60aa
I borrowed this technique from other test cases I found, specifically in mf.dll