On Wed Dec 6 17:12:05 2023 +0000, Rémi Bernon wrote:
Okay I see, I got confused by the names of the objects then which look very much like the protocols in use. Maybe would be better to use a less technical and more descriptive name, regardless of their underlying types.
Sorry, let's forget about it then, everything else is named like the protocols... well, those ones are particularly awful with their prefix and suffix but there's consistency.