Re: [PATCH 0/1] MR2197: rpcrt4: Use the _recalloc function instead of reimplementing it.

[Alex Henrie (＠alexhenrie)]

On Wed Feb 15 08:39:54 2023 +0000, Huw Davies wrote:
> Yeah, I'm not convinced this is worth the effort.

My goal here was to take code that was made ugly by using CRT allocation functions and restore it to its original simplicity. When I did the CRT rewrite, I didn't know about _recalloc, and now I'm trying to undo the damage caused by my ignorance.

What would the advantage be to dropping the dependency on ucrtbase?