This one is somewhat tricky, as the existing `ProcessorFeatures` array is limited to `PROCESSOR_FEATURE_MAX` aka 64 entries, while this now defines features up to index 88.
To handle the higher number of features, this patch extends `KUSER_SHARED_DATA` with a separate second array for the later features. This requires updating an assert about its size.
If there's a better place to store the excess feature bits, I'm open for suggestions. As far as I can see, there's no obvious place that would be ABI visible where it should be stored. (I also see that upstream definitions of `KUSER_SHARED_DATA` has been extended with another new field that Wine doesn't have - so having our own data there probably isn't ideal.)
So if there's some other convenient way of storing this (e.g. a global variable in ntdll) that also works, but it would need to be accessible from both the PE and unix sides, so it's probably not very straightforward either?