10 Apr
2023
10 Apr
'23
6:54 p.m.
On Mon Apr 10 18:54:12 2023 +0000, Zebediah Figura wrote:
Forwarding back to d3dx10 seems questionable. There was an idea to
have a shared wine-specific module that would carry all or most of d3dx bits. There was, but it's not clear it's necessary in this case, when it's possible to simply forward one export to another. We already forward all the other d3dx10 methods to d3dx10_43, and I'm not aware of a reason not to do that for d3dx11 as well.
Yeah, I rather we don't do that, if nothing else because it will get in the way of the helper module route.
I'll try to prepare a MR with my patches to implement D3DX11GetImageInfoFromMemory() via private module soon.