Re: [PATCH 0/5] MR6399: Implement GetExtendedTcp/UdpTable on top of a new server call

[Huw Davies (＠huw)]

On Fri Aug 30 16:34:32 2024 +0000, Tim Clem wrote:
> I started down that path, but I had a similar feeling to what Zeb had
> about the tests - the request handlers felt like they were turning into
> `if` spaghetti. I can revisit that if you like. Most of the structure
> could be reused, with the understanding that the `remote` and `state`
> fields will be invalid for UDP.

That's really a quesiton for @julliard.